WhatsApp

The GTI Label — this product's ethical and social footprint.

Chat & messaging
E 10.2
10.2 / 100 medium

Weighted under the Labour first profile. 2 declared components across 2 layers.

The product itself

How this product scores on its own merits — its licence, ownership and openness — separate from the stack it's built on.

Own score medium 6.3

Flags

  • Amazon Web Services concentration

    Hyperscaler chokepoint — a handful of providers host much of the web.

  • Meta (Llama trainer) labour

    Documented concerns over data-labelling and content-moderation labour conditions.

By layer

Hosting & network medium 12.5

Amazon Web Services

Services medium 12.5

Meta (Llama trainer)

By axis

The score is the vector — each axis is scored on its own, then weighted into the number above. Open an axis to see the reasoning behind it.

Data sovereignty & surveillance medium 8.3
Show detail ▼

Where data lives and the surveillance capacity it grants. 5 = fully sovereign.

The product itself medium 2 / 5

Messages are end-to-end encrypted, but rich metadata flows to Meta.

Amazon Web Services medium 1 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 1 / 5
Environmental footprint medium 25.0
Show detail ▼

Energy source, hardware lifecycle, water/cooling. Follows provenance.

Amazon Web Services medium 2 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 2 / 5
Local economic benefit medium 0.0
Show detail ▼

Does the spend stay in-region (5) or leave (1)?

Amazon Web Services medium 1 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 1 / 5
Market concentration medium 0.0
Show detail ▼

Does using this reinforce a chokepoint or monopoly? 5 = no lock-in / many alternatives.

Amazon Web Services medium 1 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 1 / 5
Openness & lock-in medium 8.3
Show detail ▼

Can you leave, and can others reach it? 5 = open access with no account required and easy data export; 1 = a walled garden — account-gated, proprietary, hard to export.

The product itself medium 1 / 5

Phone-locked; no interoperability or data export.

Amazon Web Services medium 2 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 1 / 5
Ownership model medium 0.0
Show detail ▼

Who benefits from ownership? Shareholder / private-equity extraction (1) vs worker-owned / nonprofit / state or public-good (5).

The product itself medium 1 / 5

Owned by Meta; advertising-adjacent and shareholder-driven.

Amazon Web Services medium 1 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 1 / 5
Software freedom (FOSS) medium 8.3
Show detail ▼

Is the software free & open-source, and under what licence? 5 = fully FOSS under an OSI-approved licence; 1 = proprietary / closed source.

The product itself medium 1 / 5

Closed source.

Amazon Web Services medium 1 / 5

Core managed services are proprietary and closed-source.

Meta (Llama trainer) medium 2 / 5

Releases notable OSS (React, PyTorch) but core products are closed.

Upstream labour medium 25.0
Show detail ▼

Chip fabrication, warehouse, data-labelling conditions. Follows provenance.

Amazon Web Services medium 2 / 5
Meta (Llama trainer) medium 2 / 5

Similar labels

Other products in the same space, best score first.